Binod Prasad Yadav @ Binod Yadav @ Binod Yadav Master v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42050 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2022 Thana- UDAKISHUNGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.
BINOD PRASAD YADAV @ BINOD YADAV @ BINOD YADAV MASTER Son of Tapeshwari Yadav R/O Laxmipur, P.S.- Udakishunganj and District - Madhepura 2.
Pujesh Kumar @ Pushpesh Kumar @ Bittu Yadav Son of Binod Prasad Yadav @ Binod Yadav @ Binod Master R/O Laxmipur, P.S.- Udakishunganj and District - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chowbey Jawahar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 332, 333, 188 and 171(E) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 10 of the Loudspeaker Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner No. 2.
Permission is accorded.
The informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioner, variously armed, blocked the road, disturbed ambulance movement, created ruckus and also obstructed police in discharge of official duty as the informant along with the police force were
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42050 of 2022(3) dt.12-12-2022 2/2 chasing a criminal.
Learned counsel next submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the allegations as alleged are general and omnibus in nature, it is further submitted that petitioner being villager had gone to the place of occurrence to see that as to why the protest was being carried out and when she came to know that owner of nursing home was killed for which the protest was being carried out by the villagers for arresting the criminals. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioner No. 1, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 18 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T