← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49191/2016rejected

Chano Mandal @ Chand Kishore Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49191 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -59 Year- 2015 Thana -GWALPARA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Chano Mandal @ Chand Kishore Mandal son of Late Ghuttar Mandal, resident of Village- Ekaniya, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

The application is for grant of bail in connection with Gowalpara PS case no. 59/2015 for the offence under Sections 353, 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that there is nothing against the petitioner in connection with this case and whatever recovery is there, it is in connection with Beldour P.S. and not in connection with this case. It is further submitted that petitioner has been remanded in this case on 25.06.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail and stated that he is accused in large

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49191 of 2016 (3) dt.16-01-2017 2/2 no. of cases of similar nature and further two mobiles were recovered from his possession which appears from para 66 of case diary.

Having heard both sides. From perusal of impugned order, it appears that petitioner has criminal antecedent and involved in large no. of cases. The impugned order also shows that there are materials available against this petitioner also. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case , I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. As such, his prayer for bail rejected at this stage. However, learned court is directed to expedite the trial.

With these observations, this bail application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) rinkee/- U T