Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46278/2017bail granted

Vikaram Das v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46278 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46278 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -407 Year- 2017 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Vikaram Das Son of Late Surendra Das, R/o Village- Mahamadpur, P.S. and District- Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No.407 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304B, 201, 504 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons is of killing the daughter along with in-laws. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not related to the family members of the deceased and he is outsider living in another village. Except suspicion, there is nothing against him. The petitioner is in custody for about three months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46278 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. I, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Caase no.407 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T