Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41828/2016bail granted

Chandan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-06Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41828 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -143 Year- 2016 Thana -GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Chandan Kumar Singh Son of Jamadar Singh Resident of village - Nizampur, P.S. Sarai, O.P., District Siwan .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 06-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with G.B. Nagar P.S. Case No. 143 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., he is in custody since 13.07.2016 but as submitted he has not been put on test identification parade, nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession, informant Sunil Kumar Singh witnesses Krishna Singh have sworn affidavit regarding innocence of the petitioner, besides confessional statement of the petitioner there is no other material against him to which the learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent and he has confessed his guilt.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41828 of 2016 (2) dt.06-10-2016 2/2 petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with G.B. Nagar P.S. Case No. 143 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/avinU T