← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36454/2018bail granted

Tinku Kumar Sah @ Tinku Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-27Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36454 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2018 Thana- MOUZAHIDPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Tinku Kumar Sah @ Tinku Kumar, Son of Arjun Sah, resident of village - Marwa Asthan, Maheshpur, P.S. Babbarganj, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 364, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It appears that co-accused, Karku Yadav, who was refused bail by the impugned order has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.42332 of 2018, considering the fact that allegation of kidnapping was against co-accused, Gaurav Goswami and Rahul Sah and allegation of commission of injury with knife was against Kundan Yadav.

Since allegation against the petitioner is similar to co-accused, Karku Yadav, hence, let the petitioner, above

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36454 of 2018(3) dt.27-08-2018 2/2 named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Mojahidpur (Babbargunj) Police Station Case No.03 of 2018, subject to condition that both the bailors shall be resident of within the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and the petitioner shall fully co-operate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Kumar, J) abhishek/- U T