← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./476/2011dismissed

Ram Ashish Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-08-21Mr. Justice V.N. Sinha,Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.476 of 2011 IN LPA No. 1092 of 2003 =========================================================== Ram Ashish Singh, S/O Late Hitan Singh, R/O Village - Kunjawan, P.O. Kunjawan, P.S. Bihta, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner/Director of Industries, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna

2. The Secretary, Patna Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna

3. The Managing Director, Patna Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maindan, Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Kumar, SC-11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA) Date: 21-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the review petitioner and the State of Bihar.

2. By filing this review petition petitioner is seeking review of the order of the High Court dated 24.01.2005, passed in L.P.A. No. 1092 of 2003 whereunder Division Bench held that nothing could be brought on record to show that subsequent to the transfer of the petitioner in the Bihar State Small Industries Corporation and to Patna Industrial Area Development Authority with effect from 30.01.1976 his lien in the Industries Department of the

Patna High Court C. REV. No.476 of 2011 dt.21-08-2015 2/2 Government survived. Review petitioner having been absorbed in the service of the Authority and he having not completed ten years service in the Government there was no scope for granting him pension and in our opinion this Court in the order under review has rightly appreciated the factual position at page 4 of the said order. We find no merit in the review petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed. (V.N. Sinha, J.) (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajesh/- U