Patna High CourtMJC/2353/2014disposed

Baleshwar Prasad Yadav v. The Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna And ORS.

2017-05-23The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2353 of 2014 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5558 of 2013 =========================================================== Baleshwar Prasad Yadav, Son of Late Kunjal Prasad Yadav, Resident of VillageMahauli, P.S & District-Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Electricity Board through its Chairman, Sri Sandip Pondrik, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna.

2. Sri G.S. Khag, the General Manager-Cum-Chief Engineer, Magadh Electric Supply Division, Gaya.

3. Sri Ranjit Kumar, the Superintending Engineer, Magadh Electric Supply Division, Gaya.

4. Sri Manoj Kr. Chaudhary, the Electrical Engineer, Magadh Electric Supply Division, Gaya.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Advocate Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-05-2017 From the show-cause filed by the respondents, it is seen that the admitted dues of the petitioner has been paid, 90 per cent of the pension has been sanctioned pending finalization of the criminal case and G.P.F. and other benefits have already been paid to the petitioner vide cheques detailed in Paragraph 6, Leave Encashment and Group Insurance have also been paid vide cheques as detailed in Paragraphs 7 and 8 and 90 per cent of the pension sanctioned has also been granted to the petitioner.

Patna High Court MJC No.2353 of 2014 dt.23-05-2017 2/2 Keeping in view the aforesaid compliance made, now as the admitted claim of the petitioner pending finalization of the criminal case has been settled, no further action is required to be taken in the matter. In case the petitioner has any grievance still subsisting, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to assail the same afresh in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner, the contempt application stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 24.05.2017 Transmission Date