Most. Kishmati Devi And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.429 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16906 of 2012 ======================================================
1. Kismati Devi, w/o Late Birendra Prasad,
2. Niharik Kumari, daughter of Late Birendra Prasad, Both resident of Village - Dakhin Tola, Post Office and Police Station - Siwan, District - Siwan.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Amarjeet Sinha the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna
2. Mr. Amarjeet Sinha, the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna
3. Registrar, Vivekanand Shukla, Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar, Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur
4. Dr. Ravi Verma the Vice-Chancellor, Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar, Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur
5. Mr. P.N. Sinha the Finance Officer, Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar, Bihar University , Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur
6. Registrar, Mr. Vijay Pratap Kumar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra District - Saran at Chapra
7. Prof. Dr. S.N. Dubey , the Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, District - Saran at Chapra .... .... Opp. Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubh Narain Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Raj Kishore Rai, G.P. 18 For J.P.University : Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, Advocate For Bihar University : Mr. D. Mukherjee, Sr.Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 25-11-2016 It is submitted by learned counsel for the J.P.University that the amounts to be paid are ready to be paid to the petitioners subject to the deposit of the indemnity bond by them. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the same shall be produced before the authorities of the University within two weeks from today.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the order under contempt appears to have been complied with subject to the
Patna High Court MJC No.429 of 2014 (8) dt.25-11-2016 said payments being made on production of the indemnity bond. The contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) spal/- U