← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10963/2022disposed

Renu Kumari v. The Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank

2022-08-12The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10963 of 2022 ====================================================== Renu Kumari Wife of Sri Om Prakash, Proprietor of Puja Enterprises, Resident of Mohalla - Madhuria, P.S. - Laheri, District - Nalanda (Biharsharif), Presently residing at Village and Post and P.S. - Telhara, District - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank through its Managing Director, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Managing Director, Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, having his Office, Head Office Sri Vishnu Commercial Complex, NH - 30 New Bypass, Near B.P. Highway, Pin Code - 800016, Patna (Bihar). 3.

The Regional Manager, The Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank having his Office - Garhpar, P.S. - Biharsharif, District - Nalanda. 4.

The Chief Branch Manager/Branch Manager Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Amber Branch, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

5.

Sri Mahendra Kumar Laxmi Recovery Agency Authorized, appointed the Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Virendra Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Mahesh Narayan Parbat, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) ====================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/ Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential ofÏces/residences. Also, the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/ofÏces.) ====================================================== Date : 12-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

2/4

3/4 After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not to be in favour with the submissions made across the Bar, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to take recourse to such other remedies, as are otherwise available, in accordance with law.

Permission granted.

4/4 We are sure that as and when any such proceedings are initiated, before the appropriate forum/Tribunal, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law.

Needless to add, period for which the petitioner has been pursuing the matter before this Court, shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation.

It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open.

The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (S. Kumar, J) Amrendra/PKP AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 16.08.2022 Transmission Date