Prakash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17623 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -225 Year- 2016 Thana -DINARA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Prakash Kumar, Son of Sri Kamendra Sah, resident of village - Semari, P.S. Dawath, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------- 07-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No.225 of 2016 registered under Section 379 and, later on, added Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that, in fact, the petitioner alongwith others were apprehended by the police showing the recovery of looted motorcycle and firearms from their possession regarding which Dawath P.S. Case No.94 of 2016 was instituted. Thereafter, the police got recorded the confessional statement of the petitioner showing the recovery of another motorcycle from his possession,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17623 of 2017 (5) dt.07-07-2017 2/2 as detailed in paragraph-34 of the case diary. While the said motorcycle is not looted property of the present case but, in spite of that, the petitioner has been remanded in the present case on 13.01.2017.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Lal Bihari Paswan, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bikramganj, District-Rohtas, in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No.225 of 2016. Out of the two sureties, one must be close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he/she is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T