Satyendra Yadav @ Satendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46458 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2015 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== Satyendra Yadav @ Satendra Yadav son of late Hira Lal Yadav, R/o villageArar, P.S.- Gopalganj, District-Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Binode Bariar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SRI RANA RANDHIR SINGH ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected thrice vide order dated 12.01.2016, 21.09.2016 and 26.04.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 53098 of 2015, 36569 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 18514 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 16.09.2015 having no criminal antecedent, inquest report and post mortem report do not support the prosecution version and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. Further the trial has not been concluded within four months and the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

Learned APP fairly submits that the trial has not been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46458 of 2017(2) dt.20-09-2017 2/2 concluded and the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge III, Gopalganj in S. Tr. No. 527 of 2015 arising out of Gopalganj Town P. S. Case No. 305 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T