Barun Kumar Sah @ Raghvendra Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40634 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2026 Thana- Kharagpur District- Munger ====================================================== Barun Kumar Sah @ Raghvendra Kumar Sah S/o Bajrang Lal Sah Resident of Village / Mohalla - West Ajimganj, P.S - Kharagpur, District - Munger ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kumar Kamal Nayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 09.01.2026 at 09:00PM Shyam and Barun (petitioner) came to his house in a drunken condition and started abusing, on objection, Shyam assaulted his brother Jay Shankar by Khanti causing injury on head and leg while Barun assaulted him by lathi causing injury on head and fled threatening not to institute a case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40634 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026 2/3
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that though it is alleged that petitioner came in a drunken condition, but then the case is not instituted under the Excise Act, it is fairly submitted that injury suffered by Jay Shankar has been opined to grievous, but then allegation of assaulting Jay Shankar is against Shyam, it is next submitted that as far as petitioner is concerned he is alleged to have assaulted the informant by lathi causing injury on head and the blow is not alleged to be repeated and the injury has been opined to be simple in nature, as would manifest from the pleading made at Para 10 of the anticipatory bail application.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner, the above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40634 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026 3/3 with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T