← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39701/2019bail rejected

Jailor Yadav @ Vikram Yadav @ Vikash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-24Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39701 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2018 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== JAILOR YADAV @ VIKRAM YADAV @ VIKASH YADAV Son of Bachhu Yadav Resident of Village-Basantpur Harahar, P.S.-Kako (Bhelawar), DistrictJehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in S.Tr. No. 01/2019, 25/2019, arising out of Kako (Bhelawar) P.S. Case No. 75/2018, instituted for offence under Section(s) 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of Arms Act.

Earlier prayer for bail of petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 07.12.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50723/2018 with liberty to renew prayer for bail after six months if no substantial progress is made in trial. In the written report, there is direct allegation against this petitioner of causing firearm injury to the daughter of informant, namely, Puja Kumari, who died on account of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39701 of 2019(3) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 aforesaid injury.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is in custody since 29.04.2018.

Report from the court below about stage of trial has been received, from which it appears that three witnesses have already been examined till date. Trial court has mentioned in the report that trial will be concluded within eight months. In view of such, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner. Prayer for bail of petitioner is again rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within six months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order either by fixing the case on day to day basis or by giving short adjournment and send compliance report.

Petitioner may renew prayer for bail in the event trial is not concluded within aforesaid period.

(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T