Patna High CourtCWJC/19835/2011dismissed

Pooja Kashyap v. The Union Of India And ORS

2015-10-15Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.19835 of 2011 dt.15-10-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19835 of 2011 =========================================================== Pooja Kashyap W/O Shri Sanjeet Kumar Gupta R/O Village- Puraini, Police Station- Puraini, District- Madhepura .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India Through The Petroleum Secretary, Department of Oil And Natural Gas, Government Of India, New Delhi

2. The Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Through Its General Manager (Marketing Corporate) A Government Of India Enterprises, Having Its Registered Office At Bharat Bhawan, 1, 4 & 6, Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai - 400001

3. The Area Marketing Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, 3rd Floor, Ashiana Chambers, Exhibition Road, Patna

4. Sri A.K. Saini S/O Not Known To The Petitioner Presently Posted As Marketing Officer, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, 3rd Floor, Ashiana Chambers, Exhibition Road, Patna

5. Sri Shashi Shekhar Verma S/O Not Known To The Petitioner Presently Posted As Area Sales Manager, Purnia Zone, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

6. Shri Amit Naskar S/O Not Known To The Petitioner Presently Posted As Rural Marketing Officer, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, 3rd Floor, Ashiana Chambers, Exhibition Road, Patna

7. Sarita Devi W/O Shri Sanjay Sahani R/O Village- Puraini, Police StationPuraini, District- Madhepura .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner None For the BPCL : Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocate Mr. Apurn Harsh, Advocate Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the UOI : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 15-10-2015 None appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls.

2. Learned counsel for the Respondent-Corporation submits that the matter related to the advertisement dated 16.10.2010 pursuant to which a merit panel was prepared and published on 14.06.2011 and as such the writ petition appears to have become infructuous with passage of

Patna High Court CWJC No.19835 of 2011 dt.15-10-2015 time.

3. Be that as it may and in view of non-appearance on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U