Manki Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11048 of 2022 ====================================================== Manki Devi wife of Late Devindra Das, Resident of Village- Mahamdipur, Police Station- Mohiuddin Nagar, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

5.

The Superintendent of Police, Samastipur.

6.

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Patori, District- Samastipur. 7.

The Sub- Divisional Police Officer, Patori, District- Samastipur. 8.

Shri Pramod Ranjan, Circle Officer, Mohiuddin Nagar, District- Samastipur. 9.

Shri Anand Kashyap, Station House Officer, Mohiuddin Nagar Police Station, District- Samastipur.

10.

Shri Ram Udgar Ray, son of Ram Kishun Rai, resident of VillageMahmadipur, Police Station- Mohiuddin Nagar, District- Samastipur. 11.

Shri Kamdeo Singh, son of Late Ramchandra Singh, resident of VillageManiyar, Police Station- Mohiuddin Nagar, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (Gp18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-05-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That the petitioner craves indulgence of this Hon'ble Court for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions, command/commands for directing the respondents No. 4 and 5 to

Patna High Court CWJC No.11048 of 2022(2) dt.01-05-2023 2/2 protect the life and property of the petitioner from respondents No. 10 and 11 as such respondents No. 8 and 9 are in connivance of respondents No. 10 and 11."

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Respondents No. 4 and 5 i.e. the District Magistrate, Samastipur and the Superintendent of Police, Samastipur, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted. The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U