Firdosh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39402 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2019 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ====================================================== FIRDOSH Son of Abdul Rahman Resident of Village - Suryapur, P.S.- Araria (Bairgachhi), Distt - Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 21-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 379/511 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Araria (Bairgachhi) P.S. Case No. 204 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely on suspicion and except the confessional statement of the arrested co-accused Md.Meraj there is no other objective material to connect the petitioner with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Araria, in connection with Araria (Bairgachhi) P.S. Case No. 204 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39402 of 2019(4) dt.21-08-2019 2/2 conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T