Dharmendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40462 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-418 Year-2017 Thana- NAWADA DistrictNawada ====================================================== DHARMENDRA KUMAR, aged about 52 years, male, S/o Late Gopi Prasad Resident of Thatheri Gali, P.S.- Nawada, Distt.- Nawada ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Devendra Prasad Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S. Case No. 418 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the accusation of assault with iron rod by the petitioner are not corroborated by any injury report. The petitioner's case stands on better footing than co-accused Khurshid who is said to have assaulted the informant on his head with a cutting weapon who has been granted bail by the learned Court below. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40462 of 2019(2) dt.03-07-2019 2/2 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S. Case No. 418 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T