Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38124/2020bail granted

Mahesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-05Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38124 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2020 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== MAHESH YADAV aged about 24 years Son of Ram Ratan Yadav Resident of Village- Chiknautwa, P.S.- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307/498A/34 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, this petitioner and his family members assaulted the informant for fulfilment of dowry demand. Petitioner is the husband of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to petty family dispute. Charge sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner is in custody since 1.6.2020. In the facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner mentioned above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38124 of 2020(2) dt.05-02-2021 2/2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Madhubani in Ladaniya Police Station Case No. 98 of 2020 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T