Sahdeo Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13291 of 2014 ======================================================
1. Sahdeo Prasad son of Sohan Sao resident of mohalla Talibpur, P.S. Barh, District Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Collector, Patna.
3. Subdivisional Officer, Barh, District Patna.
4. Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.
5. Uchita Nand Jha son of Parmeshwar Jha
6. Sachita Nand Jha son of Parmeshwar Jha
7. Mosmat Urmila Devi wife of Parmeshwar Jha
8. Rama Nand Pandey son of Parmeshwar Jha
9. Gaya Nand Pandey son of Parmeshwar Jha
10. Arbind Kumar son of Parmeshwar Jha
11. Manorma Devi daughter of Parmeshwar Jha All resident of Talebpur in the Town of Barh, P.S. Barh, district Patna.
12. Paro Sao son of Nathoo Sao
13. Srimati Krishna Devi wife of Om Prakash Both resident of mohalla Salimpur, P.S. Barh, District Patna.
14. Most. Radhika Devi widow of Amar Nath Choudhary resident of village Mahnar, P.S. Mahnar, District Muzaffarpur at present residing at Kankarbagh Colony, P.S. Kankarbagh, district - Patna.
15. Gopal Prasad Choudhary son of Ramdahin Lal
16. Surendra Kumar Jaiswal son of Ramdahin Lal
17. Ashok Kumar Choudhary
18. Sarban Kumar Choudhary
19. Krishna Kumar Choudhary @ Kishore Kumar Choudhary All sons of Late Bishunlal Choudhary
20. Manoj Prasad
21. Prakash Chand
22. Pramod Choudhary All sons of Late Kailash Prasad Choudhary All resident of mohalla Talebpur Town of Barh, P.S. Barh, District - Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nandan Prasad Singh, Advocate Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, GP-16 For private respondent : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-03-2017 Heard.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13291 of 2014 (3) dt.09-03-2017 2/2 The present writ application has been preferred for a direction to the respondent nos. 1 to 4 to protect the right of the petitioner over the land appertaining to Holding No.162 (old) 37/100 (new), old Ward No.5 new ward no.14 and 218/201 situated at Mauza Talebpur Barh, P.S. Barh, district -Patna. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the application in view of the stand of the respondent State taken in the counter affidavit.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U