Ravindra Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32415 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -67 Year- 2015 Thana -NARDIGANJ District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. Ravindra Singh Son of Late Kedar Singh, Resident of Village- Rame, P.S.- Nardiganj, District- Nawada.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-08-2017 Heard the parties.
This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Nardiganj P.S.Case No.67 of 2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 307, 379, 504 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of firing on one Navin Kumar and the case is under Section 307 and other Sections of the IPC.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier after investigation, the petitioner was not sent up for trial but later on differing with the opinion, the Magistrate has taken cognizance under Section 307 and other Sections of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32415 of 2017 (3) dt.01-08-2017 2/2 Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is in custody 30.5.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that earlier the I.O. had not conducted the investigation as such he filed a Criminal Writ in this Court and on the direction of this Court, the I.O. was changed and thereafter the statement of the injured was recorded and the injury report was also brought on record and the cognizance has been taken against this petitioner also. There is direct allegation against the petitioner of firing causing injury on the neck of the injured and that is grievous in nature.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T