Kiran Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41118 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2025 Thana- BHIMPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Kiran Devi W/o Subodh Mehta Resident of Village- Kewla Ward No. 1, P.S. Bhimpur, District- Supaul 2.

Lalu Kumar @ Lalu Kumar Mehta S/o Kamleshwari Mehta Resident of Village- Kewla Ward No. 1, P.S. Bhimpur, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kamal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 324(4) 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 has antecedent of one case and is a woman, but then the said case was also filed from the side of the informant and petitioner no. 2 is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 19-11-2025 at 9:30 AM, 8 named accused persons including the petitioners came and started

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41118 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/3 abusing, on objection, Ravindar and Lalita by sharp weapon assaulted his son, grand-son and wife causing injury, on alarm, people gathered and accused fled and injured were admitted in a hospital.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that informant and the petitioner are related and are having dispute relating to property. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is not specific. It is also submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners, the petitioners will not abscond rather will co-operate in the investigation to prove their innocence.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41118 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 3/3 trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bhimpur P.S. Case No. 142 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T