Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40330/2018bail granted

Ganesh Yadav @ Ganesh Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-20Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40330 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-533 Year-2017 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Ganesh Yadav @ Ganesh Kumar Yadav, Son of Jagdish Yadav, resident of Village- Sahuriya East, P.S. Saur Bazar, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Paswan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Saur Bazar P.S. Case No. 533 of 2017, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of causing fire arm injury on the right leg of the Informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the injury has been found to be simple in nature. It has been further submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 17.03.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40330 of 2018(3) dt.20-09-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Saur Bazar P.S. Case No. 533 of 2017 with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U