Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34309/2017bail granted

Raju Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-26Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34309 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2017 Thana -DARAUNDHA District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Raju Singh, son of Later Prem Singh, Resident of Village- Dhanadih, Police Station- Daraunda, District- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Gulnar Begam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 71 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 151, 152, 353 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner that he along with several other co accused persons obstructed the police officials in discharge of their duty and also assaulted them. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no allegation of assault has been levelled against the petitioner and he can only be said to be the member of mob. Further he has been in judicial custody since 29.04.2017.

Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the above submission.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34309 of 2017 (2) dt.26-07-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM- XI, Siwan, in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 71 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T