← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37328/2020bail rejected

Nitu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2021-07-05Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37328 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2020 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== NITU KUMARI W/o Shatrudhan Rai Resident of Village- Mahisari Ward No.6, P.S.- Ujiyarpur, Distt- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Nakul Kumar Jamuar, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2021 As prayed for, through Video Conferencing, let the learned counsel for the petitioner remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office vide its notes dated 19.12.2020, within four weeks of starting of the Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State, through Video Conferencing. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Ujiyarpur P.S. Case No.74 of 2020 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dalsinghsarai, Samastipur.

The accusation is that in the selection of Anganwadi

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37328 of 2020(2) dt.05-07-2021 2/2 Sewika in the year 2018, the petitioner submitted the MarkSheet of her Matric Examination, which was, later on, on verification, found forged and fabricated.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is lady, after knowing the aforesaid fact, has resigned from the said post. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T