Vikash Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41965 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2020 Thana- BRAHMPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR VERMA Son of Krishna Kumar Verma, Resident of village- Brahampur, P.S.- Brahampur, Dist- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 02-11-2022 Let the defect, if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Brahampur P.S. Case No. 338 of 2020 lodged under Sections 341, 323, 379, 326, 307 and 504/34 of the I.P.C. As per prosecution, criminal case has been lodged against 3 known and one unknown accused persons including the present petitioner. The specific allegation against the petitioner is to throw water which was like acid upon the body of the informant and snatched money and other electronic materials from the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41965 of 2022(2) dt.02-11-2022 2/3 investigation has already been completed in this case and police has found this F.I.R. to be false and submits final form against the present petitioner. Counsel further submits that court has accepted the said final form against which the informant has preferred the revision and the order not taking cognizance against the petitioner was set aside and matter was remanded back, thereafter cognizance was taken. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 10.06.2022. There are two criminal antecedents of the petitioner in which he is on bail but those cases are between the husband and wife.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Brahampur P.S. Case No. 338 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. with other following conditions:

A. The petitioner shall support in trial and shall appear physically before the lower court on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41965 of 2022(2) dt.02-11-2022 3/3 fixed, in case of non-appearance for two consecutive dates without sufficient cause, shall be resulted into cancellation of his bail bond.

B. One of the bailors shall be close relative who shall file an affidavit before the court about his relationship with the petitioner.

C. The petitioner shall file an affidavit at the time of furnishing of bail bond that he shall not involve in such criminal activity during the continuance of present bail bond, violation of this condition shall be resulted into cancellation of his present bail bond.

With this observation, the bail application stands allowed.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ravishankar/- U T