Prince Kumar @ Laddu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42070 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2022 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RAVINDRA RAY @ RAVINDRA RAI Son of Laxmi Ray Resident of village- Gausnagar, P.S- Mahindwara, Dist- Sitamarhi, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 275 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 120(B) and 420 of the I.P.C. and Sections 30(a), 36, 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018..

As per prosecution case, Rs. 7,64,900/- and other items were recovered from the Scorpio in question in which petitioner and others were found sitting and on their disclosure 3436.920 liters illegal foreign liquor was recovered from the truck in question.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42070 of 2022(2) dt.27-09-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2022 and bears criminal antecedent of two cases of similar nature. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has neither concerned with the said vehicles in question nor with the alleged recovered wine. He also submits that provision of search and seizure has not been followed in the present case and petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise Court No.1, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 275 of 2022 , subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42070 of 2022(2) dt.27-09-2022 3/3 the affidavit in bail application.

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) vashudha/- U T