← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6839/2011dismissed

Shanti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-10-10Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6839 of 2011 ====================================================== SHANTI KUMARI wife of Anil Kumar Mandal, Resident of Village-Piprahi Tola, Lalutoken, Block-Singheshwar (west), District-Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director of Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Madhepura.

3. The District Superintendent of Education, Madhepura.

4. The Block Development Officer, Block-Singheshwar (west), DistrictMadhepura.

5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Block-Singheshwar (west), District- Madhepura.

6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat- Dular Piprahi, Block-Singheshwar (west), District- Madhepura.

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat- Dular Piprahi, BlockSingheshwar (west), District- Madhepura.

8. Shweta Kumari, Wife of- Viijay Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village Damaha, Police Station- Singheshwar (west), District Madhepura ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Dinesh Maharaj, A.C. to AAG-11 Mr. Gautam Kejriwal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 10-10-2023

1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in view of the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kalpana Rani vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. reported in 2014 (2) PLJR 665, there is no merit in the writ application filed by the petitioner and no relief can be granted.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6839 of 2011(5) dt.10-10-2023 2/2

3. As no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, the application is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U