← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15968/2021disposed

Arun Prakash Pradhan v. The Union Of India

2021-11-02Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15968 of 2021 ====================================================== Arun Prakash Pradhan Son of Late Ram Lakhan Pardhan, Resident of Jainagar, P.O. and P.S. Jainagar, District Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Chairman Railway Board of Ministry of Railway, New Delhi.

2.

The Director, Land and Amenities, Railway Board, Ministry of Railway, New Delhi.

3.

The General Manager, East Central Railway, Zonal Office, Hajipur, District Vaishali.

4.

The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Samastipur Division, Samastipur.

5.

The Assistant Divisional Manager, East Central Railway, Samastipur. 6.

The Senior Section Engineer (Works) Eastern Central Railway, Samastipur. 7.

The Assistant Divisional Engineer-II, East Central Railway Division, Darbhanga.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anwar Karim, Advocate Mr. Kameshwar Pd. Gupta, Advocate For the Railways :

Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 02-11-2021 The present writ petition has been filed seeking disposal of the representation filed by the petitioner on 19.08.2019 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) regarding minimization and fixation of rent fee/license fee at Jaynagar Railway Market of the plot in question which was allotted to the petitioner.

The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the petitioner would be approaching the General

Patna High Court CWJC No.15968 of 2021(2) dt.02-11-2021 2/2 Manager, East Central Railway, Zonal Office, Hajipur for redressal of his aforesaid grievances.

The learned counsel for the Railways Shri Anil Singh, Advocate submits that in case the petitioner files appropriate representation, the same shall be considered, in accordance with law and disposed off expeditiously.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate representation before the respondent no. 3 and in case such a representation is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be disposed off by a reasoned and a speaking order, in accordance with law. It is needless to state that in case the petitioner files representation within a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against him for forcibly evicting him from the premises in question on the ground of non-payment of demand raised, till the disposal of the same. The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U