Ajay Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53739 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2021 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
AJAY PANDEY Son of Basant Pandey Resident of Mohalla- Salempur, Nauranga, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya.
2.
SANTOSH PANDEY @ SANTOSH @ SANTOSH KUMAR PANDEY @ GUDDU PANDEY @ GUDDA Son of Basant Pandey Resident of MohallaSalempur, Nauranga, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya. 3.
BASANT PANDEY Son of Late Ramanand Pandey Resident of MohallaSalempur, Manpur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya 4.
NIKESH @ NIKESH PANDEY @ NIKESH KUMAR PANDEY Son of Vinod Pandey Resident of Mohalla- Salempur, Nauranga, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya.
5.
KARU PANDIT @ KAMLESH PANDEY @ KAMLESH KUMAR PANDEY Son of Vinod Pandey Resident of Mohalla- Salempur, Nauranga, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Tabish Sharfuddin For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ramchandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case no. 04 of 2021 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Prosecution story relates to abuse and assault to the informant by the petitioners and other co-accused persons by means of lathi danda over a trivial dispute relating to immersion of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53739 of 2021(2) dt.12-04-2022 2/2 ash.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Both parties have received injuries in the alleged occurrence. Without any plausible reason, FIR has been got registered after a delay of nine days.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case no. 04 of 2021, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U