Jaypal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41217 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2026 Thana- Kasar District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1.

Jaypal Kumar Son of Jairam Raut Resident of Village- Gangapur, P.S.- Kasar, District- Sheikhpura 2.

Dharmpal Kumar Son of Jairam Raut Resident of Village- Gangapur, P.S.- Kasar, District- Sheikhpura 3.

Shishupal Kumar Son of Jairam Raut Resident of Village- Gangapur, P.S.- Kasar, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118, 109, 76, 303(2), 329(4), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioners along with others have assaulted the informant and her family members.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41217 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 also a counter version of this case. It has further been submitted that nature of allegation is general and omnibus. Both the parties are agnates and in the occurrence, both the parties have received injuries. It has further been submitted that though injury of the injured persons shows that they have received grievous injuries but the nature of allegation is general and omnibus. It was a free fight between the parties. Petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and they are languishing in judicial custody since 17.04.2026.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sheikhpura in connection with Kasar P.S. Case No.36 of 2026.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T