Bhrat Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38793 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -222 Year- 2016 Thana -GARAUL District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Bhrat Sahni Son of Sirchan Sahni, R/o Village- Kishun Pur Telaur, P.S.- Goraul (Katahara O.P.), District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kuamr Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Alka ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-09-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Goraul P.S.Case No.222 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Section 354(C ) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(A) of the IT Act, 2000.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he has taken obscene pictures of the daughter of the informant and pressured her to live like his wife and also threatened her. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that all the offences are bailable in this case and he has been falsely implicated in this case as he had lodged a case against the informant with respect to purchase of vehicle, for which he had given loan to the informant but the informant is not returning the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38793 of 2017 (3) dt.01-09-2017 2/2 money now, as such the present case has been lodged. The petitioner is in custody for more than four months. Heard learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for bail stating that the girl was threatened and her obscene pictures were taken and on the basis of that; she was threatened to live like wife of the petitioner, as such there is serious allegation against him and he does not deserve bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner is directed to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case before the court concerned itself.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T