Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40344/2018bail granted

Sinku Pathak @ Sintu @ Rahul @ Baba @ Rakesh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-20Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40344 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2016 Thana- BELHAR District- Banka ====================================================== Sinku Pathak @ Sintu @ Rahul @ Baba @ Rakesh Son of Mukund Bihari Pathak resident of village - Khesar, Police Station - Belhar (Khesar), District - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Balram Kapri For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Belhar (Khesar) P.S. Case No. 316 of 2016, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 412/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been alleged by the Informant that during patrolling duty one motorcycle was searched and the same was found to be stolen and one Bittu Singh was arrested. He disclosed the name of petitioner from whom he had purchased the motorcycle. Petitioner is in custody since, 18.10.2017. Chargesheet has already been submitted in this case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40344 of 2018(3) dt.20-09-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with Belhar (Khesar) P.S. Case No. 316 of 2016, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U