Golu @ Golu Kumar @ Rajnandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42656 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2025 Thana- MEDNI CHAUKI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Golu @ Golu Kumar @ Rajnandan Kumar S/o Saryug Kumar @ Saryug Mahto R/o Village - Salarpur, P.S. - Medini Chowki, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Heard Mr. Anuj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Parmanand Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 12.09.2025, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 12 of 2026 arising out of Mednichawki P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 09.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. According to the prosecution case, he along with other co-accused persons tried to snatch gold chain from the neck of the informant's son and when he tried to oppose the same then the petitioner fired on the head of the informant's son.

4. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42656 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026 2/2 rejected vide order dated 19.01.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 83373 of 2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.

5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that from perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that there is specific and direct allegation against the petitioner that he has fired upon the head of the informant's son and he has received injury and the injury is grievous in nature.

6. Considering the nature of allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. as well as supported by the medical evidence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 12 of 2026 arising out of Mednichawki P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge Vth, Lakhisarai.

7. Prayer is refused.

Ibrar//- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U