← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51592/2021partly allowed disposal

Rajeev Kumar @ Raju Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-16Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51592 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-326 Year-2019 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

RAJEEV KUMAR @ RAJU RAM S/o Gajadhar Ram @ Gajeshwar Prasad Ram Resident of Village- Ismail Chak, P.S.- Sonepur, District- Saran 2.

RAVI RANJAN KUMAR S/o Lalan Ram R/o Village- Ismail Chak, P.S.- Sonepur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Himanshu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2022 Heard both the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner no.1 as he has already been arrested.

Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner no.1 is dismissed as having become infructuous.

The petitioner seek bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No.326 of 2019 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no overt act alleged against the petitioner. All the family

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51592 of 2021(2) dt.16-02-2022 2/2 members have been impleaded as accused by the informant. The specific allegation of using farsha is on Golu Kumar and other co-accused has also been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Having considered the allegation and there is no specific overt act has been assigned to the petitioner and other co-accused have also been granted anticipatory bail, I am inclined to grant benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner no.2 and in the event of arrest, he shall be released on bail subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) amit/- U T