Dinesh Pandit v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.40643 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2018 Thana -JALE District- DARBHANGA ======================================================
1. Dinesh Pandit S/o Mahavir Pandit, R/o Vill.- Kazi Bahera, TolaDhamad, P.S.- Jalley, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Iqbal Asif Niazi, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-09-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 11.03.2018 in connection with Jalley P.S. Case No. 12 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 363, 366(A), 504, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of assisting the coaccused Rajesh Chopal in abducting the minor daughter of the informant.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the statement of girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., clearly shows that she has not taken the name of petitioner and has stated that she married with the co-accused Rajesh Chopal with her sweet will. Further, the petitioner is in custody since 11.03.2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and considering the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40643 of 2018 (3) dt.24-09-2018 2/2 aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000, (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Darbhanga, in connection with Jalley P.S. Case No. 12 of 2018, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T