Yogendra Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40754 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -192 Year- 2017 Thana -Sanhola District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Yogendra Kumar Mandal Son of Jai Prakash Mandal Resident of Village - Nanokhar (Chak Suleman), P.S. Sanhoula, District Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate, For the Opposite Party : Mrs. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sanhoula P.S.Case No. 192 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 384 and 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per FIR against the petitioner is of committing theft of cash of Rs. 1500/- on the point of pistol and the same has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated and he has no criminal history and he is in custody since 16.09.2017. Heard learned A.P.P also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40754 of 2018 (3) dt.24-09-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Bhagalpur in connection with Sanhaulla P.S.Case No. 192 of 2017 subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T