Amarjeet Mahto @ Amarjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50486 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-582 Year-2024 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Amarjeet Mahto @ Amarjeet Kumar Son of Jamadar Mahto @ Jamdar Mahto Resident of Village- Deoriya, P.S.- Ribilganj, District- Saran (Chapra) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravinesh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 582 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 109 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner and other accused, along with unknown associates, chased the informant's Brezza car on motorcycles and indiscriminately fired at it with the intention to murder the informant and his companion while they were travelling to attend a wedding.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50486 of 2026(2) dt.23-07-2026 2/3 that the petitioner is in custody since 20.03.2026. Petitioner bears four (4) criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. From perusal of the FIR, it would reveal that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, rather the same is against other co-accused person. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner specifically submits that no one sustained injury during alleged occurrence.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 582 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50486 of 2026(2) dt.23-07-2026 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial and shall not remain absent on two consecutive dates without sufficient cause.

(III) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence or the witnesses during the trial.

If any of the above conditions are violated, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T