Mani Kant Mandal @ Mani Kant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40590 of 2018 (3) dt.20-09-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40590 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -42 Year- 2018 Thana -RUPAULI District- PURNIA ====================================================== Mani Kant Mandal @ Mani Kant Kumar, S/o Ganga Dhar Mandal, Resident of Village- Tin Tenga @ TinTanga P.S. Tikapatti, DistrictPurnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Ranjan Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chaubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Rupauli P.S. Case No. 42/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is kidnapping of daughter of informant in which petitioner is also named accused.

It has been submitted that girl has been recovered and in her statement under 164 Cr.P.C. she has named Saryug Mandal, as kidnapper who dragged her on Scorpio and except one driver there was no one in the Scorpio. Name of petitioner has surfaced in the case on the basis of identification of his nephew. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40590 of 2018 (3) dt.20-09-2018 since 11.05.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 42/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U