Nasruddin Khan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39217 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2018 Thana- SIKTI District- Araria ====================================================== 1.
Nasruddin Khan, age 60 years, Male, Son of Late Tinkori Khan 2.
Sahabuddin Khan, age 22 years, Male, Son of Nasruddin Khan 3.
Asauddin Khan, age-25 years, Male, Son of Nasruddin Khan 4.
Bhutto Khan, age-19 years, Male, Son of Nasruddin Khan All resident of Village - Parariya, P.S.- Sikty, District - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md. Naushad Uzzoha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sikty P.S. Case No. 92 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 341, 323, 324, 427, 504, 506, 379, 354B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
In the present case, an allegation has been that on account of dispute relating to Mango orchard, both the parties have altercated with themselves.
There is a case and counter case from both sides. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39217 of 2019(2) dt.27-06-2019 2/2 or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Araria in connection with Sikty P.S. Case No. 92 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioners for investigation/interrogation, they will remain present and if they would not present themselves, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T