Azad Tatma @ Azad Kumar Tatma @ Azad Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40605 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-834 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria ====================================================== AZAD TATMA @ AZAD KUMAR TATMA @ AZAD KUMAR Son of Vinod Tatma Resident of Village-Karhaiya Shankarpur, P.S.-Sonamani Godam (Kursakanta), District-Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kalpana Devi Wife of Azad Kumar Tatma D/o Gulabchand Tatma Resident of Village-Karhaiya Ward No.04, P.S.-Sonamani Godam (Kurskanta), District-Araria.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 834 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant and has been falsely implicated on the accusation of demand for dowry and inflicting torture for nonfulfilment thereof. The parties were sent for mediation, in respect of which mediation report dated 14.11.2019 has been received. It transpires that the petitioner and his family members

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40605 of 2019(4) dt.04-12-2019 2/2 have outright refused to keep the complainant, although she has expressed her unconditional willingness to live with the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the complainant appears and has been heard.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and gravity of offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

6. The provisional bail granted to the petitioner by this Court by order dated 02.07.2019 shall stand cancelled. (Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T