Naveen @ Neviya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38844 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2018 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== NAVEEN @ NEVIYA Son of Sukhdeo Sharma Resident of Near Saguna , Gandhi Murti, Police Station-Danapur, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravi Kant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 332/2018, instituted for offence under Section(s) 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of Arms Act. It is alleged in the written report that informant got information on 03.08.2018 that her son Sukhu Kumar has been murdered at 17.00 hrs. near Prashray Apartment, Railway Colony, Gola Road, Patna, by this petitioner and other accused persons. The informant found dead body of her son in SubDivisional Hospital, Danapur. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no eye-witness to the occurrence.
The other co-accused persons have already been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38844 of 2019(2) dt.01-07-2019 2/2 granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 03.04.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 20620/2019 and dated 10.04.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23006/2019.
Petitioner is in custody since 14.02.2019.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IInd, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 332/2018, subject to the conditions that both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T