Subash Singh @ Subhas Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41343 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2018 Thana -KARAHGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Subash Singh @ Subhas Singh S/o Late Gopal Singh, R/o Vill.- Semaria, P.S.- Kargahar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Kargahar P.S.Case No.100 of 2018 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 332, 354, 504, 452 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Informant has alleged that 5 F.I.R. named accused tried to outrage modesty of Puja Kumari and on her raising alarm Bimlesh Singh came who was shot by them and who subsequently succumbed to injury. Allegation against the petitioner is that he subsequently arrived at place of occurrence and cause Fire arm injury upon Kameshwar Singh on his arm which is simple in nature. It is submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41343 of 2018 (3) dt.20-08-2018 2/2 antecedent and he is in custody since 22.03.2018. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram, in Kargahar P.S.Case No.100 of 2018 subject to the conditions that: (1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) AnilKrSinha/- U