Md. Nehal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41914 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2021 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

MD. NEHAL Son of Md. Akbar Resident of village - Kranpura, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Dist.- Vaishali.

2.

Md. Altamsh @ Heera Son of Md. Akbar Resident of village - Kranpura, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Dist.- Vaishali.

3.

Md. Irsad @ Moti Son of Md. Akbar Resident of village - Kranpura, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Dist.- Vaishali.

4.

Md. Sabir Son of Late Samshool Haque Resident of village - Kranpura, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Dist.- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Saroj Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case no. 174 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354B, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of assaulting to the informant and his family members due to which they sustained injuries. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have got no criminal antecedent. There is a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41914 of 2022(2) dt.07-12-2022 2/2 land dispute between the petitioners and informant as a result of which they have falsely been implicated in this case. There is case and counter case, both party sustained injuries as alleged in separate occurrence. It is further stated that injuries sustained by informant and his family members are simple in nature. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case no. 174 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T