Sajjan @ Md. Ali Raza @ Md. Sajjan @ Sajan Ali Raja v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41106 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-550 Year-2025 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== Sajjan @ Md. Ali Raza @ Md. Sajjan @ Sajan Ali Raja son of Md. Mahtab Resident of village- Nimarang, Ward no. 27, Ps and Dist- jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 550 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner, along with others, surrounded the informant, and it is specifically alleged that one Md. Mahtab assaulted the informant on his head with sword due to which he received an injury on his forehead. During the course of investigation, it has come that the petitioner has also assaulted one Md. Imtiyaz.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41106 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the nature of the allegation is general and omnibus. He further submits that the injury that has been caused to Md. Imteyaz is on non-vital part. He further submits that the main thrust of allegation is against Md. Mahtab. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 08.05.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 550 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T