Jalandhar Yadav @ Janardhan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44894 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2018 Thana -MAHILA P.S DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
1. JALANDHAR YADAV @ JANARDHAN YADAV S/o Sri Gorakh Yadav, R/o Vill.- Narainpur Chiran Tola, Ward no. 4, P.S.- Bagaha patkhauli, District- West Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prithvi Nath Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 06 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 354 of the Indian Penal Code and 8 POCSO Act.
As per F.I.R. allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner caught hold the informant and misbehaved with her. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the allegation is false and concocted and case under POCSO Act, is not made out against the petitioner and moreover, he is in custody since 26.03.2018. It is further submitted that the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44894 of 2018 (3) dt.06-09-2018 2/2 has no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned A.P.P also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge- 1st Class, Bagaga, West Champaran in connection with Mahila P.S.Case No. 06 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T