Vivekanand Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
Patna High Court MJC No.2366 of 2013 dt.06-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2366 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11072 of 2010 =========================================================== VIVEKANAND THAKUR, S/O LATE KANTI PRASAD THAKUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST- LUKLUKI, P.S- GODDA AND DISTRICT- GODDA, STATE- JHARKHAND AT PRESENT RESIDING AT MOHALLA- GANDHI NAGAR, NEAR MISSION, HOSPITAL, P.O+ P.S- GODDA, DISTRICTGODDA, JHARKHAND. .... .... PETITIONER/S
VERSUS
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
2. SRI SANDEEP SHEKHAR PRIYADARSI, SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MADHORA, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA.
3. SRI KUMAR JUNG BAHADUR, THE DIRECTOR PROVIDENT FUND DIRECTORATE, BIHAR, PATNA.
4. SRI RAJESHWAR CHANDRA VANS, DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, PURNEA.
5. MD. AFZAL ALI ANSARI, DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, SARAN AT CHAPRA.
6. SRI P.K. SINGH, THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. .... .... RESPONDENT/S =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
For the State : Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, AC to GP-15. For Accountant General : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-02-2015 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this application when the case is called out, while learned counsel for the Accountant General and learned A.C. to G.P. 15 are present. Learned counsel for the State submits that in compliance of the order under contempt, the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of and regarding the payment of admitted
Patna High Court MJC No.2366 of 2013 dt.06-02-2015 dues copy of the order has been sent to the Treasury Officer, Saran at Chapra for payment through memo no. 2343 dated 20.11.2014 by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Madhora, Saran at Chapra, which would appear from the supplementary show cause filed by the opposite party no. 2, Sub-Divisional Officer, Madhora, Saran at Chapra. Since the order, under contempt, has been complied by the opposite party no. 2, therefore, no further action is required. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U