Giraja Shankar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39672 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2019 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Giraja Shankar Prasad, Gender-Male, Aged about 56 years, Son of Late Ramji Prasad Resident of Village- Ramnagar, Police Station- Ramnagar, DistrictWest Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar No 7 For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bagaha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 178 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per prosecution story, on 27.3.2019 at about 3 P.M., the accused persons entered into the Registry Office and started noising then the Informant reached there and saw the accused-petitioner and when he asked about his standing then he caught the Caller of the Informant's shirt and started abusing and threatened to kill him.
Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39672 of 2019(2) dt.28-06-2019 2/2 case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Bagaha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 178 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T