Kanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2571 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- WESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ===========================================================
1. Kanti Devi, W/o Bahadur Yadav, Resident of Village- Tunihwa, P.S.- Dhanaha, District- West Champaran.
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Usha Kumari No.1, SPP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 06.06.2018 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran, in B.P. No. 2110 of 2018, arising out of Dhanaha Police Station Case No.114 of 2015, registered under Sections 147/148/149/341/342/333/ 452/354/379/ 323/324/325 /326 / 307/188/504/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Allegation is against 32 FIR named accused persons of
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2571 of 2018 dt.20-08-2018 P2/ scuffle with the government officials when they had gone to measure the land. Further allegation is of commission of assault. Considering the general and omnibus nature of allegation as well as the appellant is a female, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.
Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date21.08.2018 Transmission Date 21.08.2018