← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41834/2017bail granted

Deepak Sao @ Deepak Saw v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-11Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41834 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -167 Year- 2016 Thana -KURTHA District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Deepak Sao @ Deepak Saw Son of Madhesh Sao, R/o village- Rupaspur, P.S.- Allipur, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kurtha P.S.Case No.167 of 2016 , registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and it appears that his name transpired during the course of investigation on confession of the co-accused.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that nothing has been recovered from his possessions nor he has been put on TIP. The petitioner is in custody for about three months. Further submission is that though he is accused in one more case but he is on bail in that case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41834 of 2017 (2) dt.11-09-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Arwal in connection with Kurtha P.S.Case No.167 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T