← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44233/2017bail granted

Sunny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-09Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44233 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -164 Year- 2017 Thana -KADAMKUAN District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Sunny Kumar, Son of Ashok Mahto, Resident of Mohalla Chai Tola, P.S. Kadam Kuan, Distt.- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sachin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kadam Kuan P.S. Case No. 164 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons of kidnapping the mentally un-sound sister of the informant. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has been made accused in this case only on the basis of suspicion. It appears that there is no eye witness in this case. Other co-accused persons have been granted regular bail. Petitioner is in custody since 22.04.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

In view of the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge VII-cum-ACJM,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44233 of 2017 (3) dt.09-10-2017 2/2 Patna in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 164 of 2017 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sushma/- U T